Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 15:11

Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump's tariffs are hammering the industry he wants to save - Politico
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What are some great short jokes?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Scottie Scheffler’s wife reveals infant son’s bathroom mishap during Memorial win - New York Post
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Alex, C. Viper, Sagat and Ingrid announced for Street Fighter 6 Season 3 - EventHubs
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What is the thing that the olden generation enjoys more than the modern generation?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What are some dirty secrets of Indian (Bollywood, etc.) actors and actresses?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
How can one find BPO clients for inbound and outbound voice processes?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years: